How an AI-written Book Shows why the Tech 'Terrifies' Creatives
For Christmas I received an intriguing present from a good friend - my very own "very popular" book.
"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.
Yet it was completely written by AI, with a few basic triggers about me supplied by my good friend Janet.
It's an intriguing read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.
It imitates my chatty design of writing, however it's likewise a bit repeated, and really verbose. It may have surpassed Janet's triggers in looking at data about me.
Several sentences start "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.
There's also a mystical, repeated hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.
There are dozens of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.
When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually offered around 150,000 customised books, generally in the US, because pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.
A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source big language model.
I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who produced it, can buy any additional copies.
There is presently no barrier to anyone developing one in anyone's name, including stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent content. Each book includes a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, developed by AI, and designed "solely to bring humour and pleasure".
Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is meant as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get offered even more.
He wishes to widen his range, creating various categories such as sci-fi, and possibly providing an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted type of customer AI - selling AI-generated products to human customers.
It's also a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to generate, and geohashing.site it does, definitely in some parts, sound much like me.
Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable content based upon it.
"We must be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we actually indicate human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to regard developers' rights.
"This is books, this is posts, this is images. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and then do more like that."
In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were phony, it was still wildly popular.
"I do not think the usage of generative AI for creative purposes ought to be banned, however I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without authorization need to be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very effective however let's develop it fairly and fairly."
OpenAI states Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps
DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking
China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger
In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually picked to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have actually decided to work together - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.
The UK federal government is about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to use creators' material on the web to help develop their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.
Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".
He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.
"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.
Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is likewise strongly against removing copyright law for AI.
"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a lot of joy," says the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.
"The government is undermining one of its best performing industries on the vague promise of growth."
A federal government spokesperson said: "No relocation will be made up until we are definitely positive we have a practical plan that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for ideal holders to help them certify their material, access to high-quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for ideal holders from AI developers."
Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI plan, a nationwide information library including public information from a large range of sources will also be provided to AI scientists.
In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.
In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to increase the security of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector required to share information of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are launched.
But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is stated to want the AI sector to deal with less policy.
This comes as a number of claims versus AI firms, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.
They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their approval, and used it to train their systems.
The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of elements which can make up fair usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it collects training information and whether it should be paying for it.
If this wasn't all adequate to ponder, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.
DeepSeek declares that it established its technology for a fraction of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's existing supremacy of the sector.
As for me and a career as an author, I think that at the moment, if I truly want a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It has lots of mistakes and users.atw.hu hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to check out in parts since it's so verbose.
But provided how rapidly the tech is progressing, I'm not exactly sure how long I can remain positive that my substantially slower human writing and editing abilities, are much better.
Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC reporters around the world.
Outside the UK? Register here.